University of Sistan and Baluchestan Journal of Historical Researches of Iran and Islam 2345-2099 9 16 2015 12 22 A study of khulasat al tavarikh status in Safavid historiography A study of khulasat al tavarikh status in Safavid historiography 21 36 2502 10.22111/jhr.2015.2502 FA Journal Article 2016 06 29 Khulasat al tavarikh book written by Ghazi Ahmad Ghomi is one of the most  imperative  history books from  kind Abbas early epoch. Initially it consisted of 5 volumes, however just the last one is available now which reveals the brief biography of Safoiddin Ardabilly till the first years of Shāh <em>Abbās</em> I  Safavid Kingdom. <br />Despite the fact that this piece work is remarkably considerable comparing to other works, especially history of Alamaraye Abbassi, since now it has been less investigated.  In this literature some aspects of Ghazi Gomi’s historiography has been considered, for instance formology  and content analyzing  of author’s outlook, notability and  characteristic of his historiography, recognizing the validity of his historical information and the method and his manuscription. Although Ghazi Ahmad Ghomi’s historiography method has never been considered as a style in Safavid historiography,  in many aspects it has transmitted the previous methods he had understood from late historians, mainly in prefacing and chronologicaling. Khulasat al tavarikh book written by Ghazi Ahmad Ghomi is one of the most  imperative  history books from  kind Abbas early epoch. Initially it consisted of 5 volumes, however just the last one is available now which reveals the brief biography of Safoiddin Ardabilly till the first years of Shāh <em>Abbās</em> I  Safavid Kingdom. <br />Despite the fact that this piece work is remarkably considerable comparing to other works, especially history of Alamaraye Abbassi, since now it has been less investigated.  In this literature some aspects of Ghazi Gomi’s historiography has been considered, for instance formology  and content analyzing  of author’s outlook, notability and  characteristic of his historiography, recognizing the validity of his historical information and the method and his manuscription. Although Ghazi Ahmad Ghomi’s historiography method has never been considered as a style in Safavid historiography,  in many aspects it has transmitted the previous methods he had understood from late historians, mainly in prefacing and chronologicaling. https://jhr.usb.ac.ir/article_2502_87239b0624bb2e10e1e51e9299b78e55.pdf