University of Sistan and Baluchestan Journal of Historical Researches of Iran and Islam 2345-2099 14 26 2020 09 10 A Comparative Study of Individual Freedom and Government Power in the Political Thought of Ayatollah Naeini and Sheikh Fazlullah Nouri A Comparative Study of Individual Freedom and Government Power in the Political Thought of Ayatollah Naeini and Sheikh Fazlullah Nouri 1 18 5537 10.22111/jhr.2020.34155.2772 FA Valliolah Esfandiar Department of Political Science, Political Thought, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Garineh Keshishyan Siraki Department of Political Science and International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 0000-0001-8645-7295 Abdolrahman Hassanifar Member of the faculty of the Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran Mohammadsalar Kasraei Member of the faculty of the Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran Journal Article 2020 04 30 The individual freedom and government power have been among the concepts and issues discussed between the various political and religious currents during the constitutional period. Against the constitutional movement, one of the basic principles of which is the individual freedom and government power. Sheikh Fazlullah Nouri and Mirza Naeini, as representatives of the two important currents of thought, confronted each other and offered different views. It seems that most of the differences go back to the political foundations and ideas of individuals, but in fact, the differences between the scholars of the constitutional era are mainly in the analysis of political currents, comments on individuals and parties, motives. There were such cases, and it was natural that there would be disagreement in discussing such matters and commenting on these cases. In a comparative study using this method of comparative research, this article discusses the ideas and positions of the legitimate constitutional current and its main leader, Sheikh Fazlullah Nouri, against the constitutionalist scholars and its main leader, Allameh Naeini. The individual freedom and government power have been among the concepts and issues discussed between the various political and religious currents during the constitutional period. Against the constitutional movement, one of the basic principles of which is the individual freedom and government power. Sheikh Fazlullah Nouri and Mirza Naeini, as representatives of the two important currents of thought, confronted each other and offered different views. It seems that most of the differences go back to the political foundations and ideas of individuals, but in fact, the differences between the scholars of the constitutional era are mainly in the analysis of political currents, comments on individuals and parties, motives. There were such cases, and it was natural that there would be disagreement in discussing such matters and commenting on these cases. In a comparative study using this method of comparative research, this article discusses the ideas and positions of the legitimate constitutional current and its main leader, Sheikh Fazlullah Nouri, against the constitutionalist scholars and its main leader, Allameh Naeini. https://jhr.usb.ac.ir/article_5537_019d0b3772fd9029b2ba7d5ed89e2c5a.pdf